I thought I’d start the New Year off with another pair of
easily confused words. In this case, the confusion comes because of similar
pronunciation rather than similar spelling.
“Of” is a preposition. Prepositions show location or direction,
and always have a few words tagging along behind them that contains a noun,
such as “within five miles of the freeway”, or “south of Main Street”. “Of” is
also commonly used to show where something came from or its composition, as in
“a man of good family”, “piece of cake”, or the “books of A M Jenner”.
“Have” is a verb. When it’s alone, it means possession; I
have a piece of cake. However, “have” is also used as a helper verb in past
tense, and this is where the confusion starts. I could have gone to the party.
I should have gone to the party. If I would have gone to the party, my
boyfriend would not have broken up with me. When could have, should have, and
would have, the three most common combinations, are contracted, they become
could’ve, should’ve, and would’ve. In each case, the contracted part is
pronounced “of”. Dictinary.com notes “inexperienced writers commonly confuse
the words, [while] professional writers exploit the misspelling deliberately,
especially in fiction, to represent the speech of the uneducated.” Don’t appear
uneducated in your internet posting by using “could of” rather than the proper
“could have”.
~Marie
i always thought that was shouldA wouldA couldA. . .
ReplyDeletethen again, i am kindA uneducated LOL
~tigs
Well, I've always gone about things a little bit differently. Possibly what my writing a little different and more interesting to read. :-)
ReplyDelete~Marie